Grumpy Humpy should bow out.
Michael White
British Journalism Review June 2006 vol. 17 no. 2 21-26
PDF
Michael White
British Journalism Review June 2006 vol. 17 no. 2 21-26
Humphrys takes this hectoring stance to the borders of self-caricature:
- John Humphrys:“Why are you telling me lies, minister?”
- Hapless Minister: “John, I am not telling you...”
- JH:“Will you stop prevaricating...”
- HM:“Let me try and answer your...”
- JH:“Don’t interrupt when I’m interrupting.”
I exaggerate, but not much. Little wonder that some politicians, such as David Cameron, now attempt to play these tactics to their own advantage, appealing to the listener for fair play:
“Let me first answer your last interruption.”
Part of what goads the interrogating classes, of course, is either spin – the propensity of a Blair or, especially, Brown to ignore the question and keep bulldozing on with the message – or bland or evasive answers.
But who encouraged politicians to behave this tedious way?
A media for whom every nuance of policy difference within a party is whipped up into a major split. We all do it, but we are not all, like the BBC is, licence-funded.
Marsh (now moved on to start the BBC’s new College of post-Torquemada Journalism) has been accused by headbangers at the New Statesman and elsewhere of emasculating the programme’s inquisitorial and pro-active journalism in the post-Hutton era. Not during the half-hour chunks I hear, he hasn’t; not while farmer Humphrys draws breath over the radio gate.
Blogged with the Flock Browser
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου